Principles of Mechanic Time

Principles of Mechanic Time

Book Title: Principles of Mechanic Time
Author: Professor Abdolreza Shahrabi Farahani
Based on: Philosophy of Subjective Physics
Based on Theories in Oriental Science and Philosophy
Explaining the Nature, Structure and Components of Space and Time
And the Oriental Medicine Science and Philosophy and elementary particles
Journey into the Depths of Time: Genesis
Book start date: 09 / August / 2006
Book completion date: May 15, 2017
Review again date: March 25, 2022
ISBN: 978-622-97382-4-5
ISBN DATE: 2022 – FIRST VOLUME OF THREE VOLUME
REGISTERED: NATIONAL LIBRARY AND DOCUMENTATION ORGANIZATION-2022
REGISTERED NO, IN THE NATIONAL LIBRARY: 8783247
Translated to the English by: Prof.Abdolreza Shahrabi Farahani
Book Link in the National library: http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/8783247

Preface by the Author
For centuries, the existence of particles under the title (energy particles or internal particles) has been talked about and points of view have been raised. Just like the topic of time, which after general relativity, it rather became a competition to have a better understanding of time itself and not seconds, minutes and hours. In the midst of the Scientific and Philosophical uproar, a question has not been raised on what the process of thought itself is or can be.
There was no question about how energy particles or life particles work, or how these processes take place, how they work, and where they come from.
Do we have a question in mind, for example about (Michael Faraday) who could not write his name correctly in the second year of elementary school, on how he was able to solve a puzzle that the genius Newton could not?
Or how Newton himself was able to state the laws of motion, matter and energy without obtaining high degrees in the university?
Or how Einstein decisively rejected Newton’s theory about time in his first year of university?
Or did no one raise the question that when Professor Stephen Hawking introduces himself (I am a Physicist and Mathematician and a bit of a Dreamer), what is this dream and where does it come from?
But the main topic in this book is based on examination and function of (particles of life or energy particles) and how they appear from the perspective of the Orient.
Why the Orient? Because these particles, which have been known as (Qi – Ki – Parana) for thousands of years, are oriental, and therefore their investigation has naturally been performed from the perspective of Oriental Sciences and Philosophy.
The theory of Principles of Mechanic Time generally has nothing to do with mechanical science, but is a name to specify the possible way these particles function in the universe and in the human body, which also has basic principles. Therefore, the name Principles of Mechanic Time was chosen for this theory.
Every theory about time is of western origin and from the point of view of these particles, time has not been investigated and no possibilities have been seen, and it has been tried to explain time as much as possible according to the function of these particles and to see if the nature, structure and components of the universe can be obtained by explaining these particles so that we can have a better view.
This can also reveal a better view of the factors and components of fundamental particles if we accept that from this point of view we can also explain time and even the creation of the universe and most importantly, thought itself.
Have we had a correct or complete view about fundamental particles?
Is it possible to explain time or fundamental particles or thought with meditation, or is it possible to create fundamental questions even through this physical and mental process?
Do we really know what happens or can happen in meditation?
Does our brain understand thinking?
Can our brain make a new structure or what it makes has already been dictated by genetic codes?
Were space and time separate and merged after the big bang?
Didn’t we have time before the big bang?
Is time really the result of movement?

Have we calculated the speed of light correctly?
Is there really a mental illness?
We can find the answer to these questions if we can say that we know thinking results from what process or processes.
We must be able to have a logical explanation for the mind in order to be able to say that mental illness exists.
What is this soul that gets ill, or what can this soul be from a scientific or philosophical point of view that leads to a mental illness.
These issues, whether we have an answer for them or not, are not at all simple and we cannot simply pass by them.
Everything that we have had, built and implemented since ancient times is the result of thinking, imagining and dreaming, and we should be able to explain these thinking, imagining and dreaming, or at least have a somewhat better understanding of them.
There was no theory or view, Science, Philosophy, inventions and discoveries that were not the result of thinking, imagination and dreams, but we are still short in the explanation of rational thinking.
We have always been told to use your brain properly, or don’t solve this problem mentally, or use your mind properly, or similar words. But during these discussions, has anyone told us how we think at all or what is thinking itself?
Using the brain correctly means knowing the structure, components and nature of the brain, and it seems that the human brain still has many surprises to discover.
In this book (first and second chapters) topics such as Meditation and famous channels in Acupuncture are mentioned along with an anatomy map and how to use needles but what may not be paid attention to at first glance is that the first and second chapters are a kind of lamp to shine light, to clarify the explanation of how fundamental particles emerged from the perspective of Oriental Sciences and Philosophy and to what extent has this been able to fulfill the author’s dream that it was the result of the action of these particles and that (the resulting thought may be the result of what process).
Do you know someone who has mentioned the possible connection between the actual performance of acupuncture and the theory of parallel worlds or something similar?
Have you seen an image, at least symbolic, about the connection of meditation with space and time?
Do you know a Scientist or a Philosopher who has mentioned a possible image or function about these particles that have been mentioned in the East for thousands of years?
Maybe these particles are of the same nature of matter, can we reject this theory?
Is there no connection to the symbol (Yin and Yang) in the East and general relativity or even Einstein’s special relativity, or its appearance and similarity to the cosmos in this symbol is just a coincidence?
Is space and time related to our diseases on earth?
Do parallel worlds mean the existence of another (me) in the same way in another world? Can’t parallel worlds be just another space and time in which there is no (similar me)?
Can a fetus in a woman’s womb be a suitable model for tracking parallel worlds?
Can what has been called (Meridians or energy channels) for thousands of years in the East lead us to a real discovery and a more logical explanation of parallel worlds?
Here, it is not at all intended to question the efforts of scientists and philosophers, but on the contrary, their efforts are to be continued, which is the way of science and philosophy.
I suggest that you don’t let things like meditation and acupuncture distract you from the nature of the mentioned subjects because they are really related to each other. Stay with Principles of Mechanic Time and look for time in another way, in a more extraordinary and smaller dimension, and maybe scarier, but maybe more real.
This book took about 22 years to be summarized and adapted to other topics, which we will reach in the next editions. For now, we will take a close look at the main issues and investigate their adaptation so that other issues can be dealt with at a better time.

Final Words
Who was my legend and inspiration? I have been asked this question regularly for about 25 years.
This is the question that I asked during the years when I was a Master of Martial Arts and a doctor, and then I entered the world of philosophy and subsequently explored other sciences.
Professors, patients, friends, colleagues and sometimes my family have asked me and I have never answered, and now may be a good time to answer in this book.
No doctor, Scientist, Philosopher, or thinker in the entire history of mankind has inspired me, and subsequently, I have not chosen any genius as my legend But all of them have been with me in this way and I thank them from the bottom of my heart, both those who are still alive and those who are not.
My inspiration has been the unknown and my myths are too many to name.
I do not accept anything classified because I have always believed that science is walking in the unknown and nothing is classified under the name of science.
My questions never end and I have as many questions as space and time, and this always made my teachers angry during school.
I sincerely thank these people whom I am naming and apologize for not naming them in order.
Albert Einstein- Newton- Edmund Halley- Michael Faraday- Schrodinger- Ibn Haytham- Aburihan- Farabi- Rumi – Ferdowsi- Stephen Hawking- Galilei – Nicolaus Copernicus- Gerardinobrano- John Hendrick Everett-Charles Robert Darwin- Carl Edward Sagan- John Archibald Wheeler – Karl Schwarzschild – Confucius- Plato- Ceciliaben- Mulla Sadra- Shams- Thales- Arthur Stanley Eddington- Leonardo da Vinci- Archimedes- Wolfgang Ernst Pauli- Humphry Davy- James Clark Maxwell-
Professor Ueshiba: Founder of Aikido
Professor Jigoro Kano: Founder of Judo.
Professor Seyed Vahhab Mirsalehi who has been by my side for years and is truly a great professor full of love to know and learn. He took my thoughts to difficult and sometimes scary challenges, for all those years which I thank and appreciate.
And every person whose name I have not mentioned, but his thinking was spread in the universe and I used them.
Science is travel in the depths of the unknown and this step in this way has the courage to raise issues that may be mocking from the eyes of others and may not even be accepted, but it must be moved and this is what I have done and will do throughout my life and to the best of my ability.

Theory and Philosophy of the Principles of Mechanic Time

The concept of ” Principles of Mechanic Time ” is a fascinating intersection of physics, philosophy, and the human experience. It encompasses both the physical mechanisms that measure time and the philosophical implications of our understanding of time itself.

Physical Principles of Mechanic Time:

Newtonian Mechanics:  Newton’s laws of motion form the foundation of classical mechanics. Time, in this framework, is absolute and uniform, flowing independently of any observer or physical system. This concept is crucial for the development of mechanical clocks, which rely on the regularity of physical processes like pendulum swings or the oscillations of a quartz crystal.

Relativity: Einstein’s theory of relativity revolutionized our understanding of time. He demonstrated that time is not absolute but relative to the observer’s frame of reference. Time can be dilated (slowed down) or contracted (sped up) depending on the observer’s velocity or gravitational field. This has implications for the accuracy of mechanical clocks in extreme environments, such as near massive objects or at very high speeds.

Thermodynamics: The second law of thermodynamics states that entropy (disorder) always increases in a closed system. This principle is related to the concept of “arrow of time,” suggesting that time flows in one direction, from past to future. The “ticking” of mechanical clocks can be seen as a manifestation of this arrow of time, as they gradually degrade and lose energy.

Philosophical Implications of Principles of Mechanic Time:

Time as a Measurement: Mechanical clocks provide a quantifiable measure of time, allowing us to compare and order events. However, this measurement is inherently limited, as it only captures a specific aspect of time.

Time as a Flow: The notion of time as a continuous flow is deeply ingrained in our experience. Mechanical clocks seem to reinforce this idea, with their hands moving steadily forward. However, this perception may be an illusion, as time itself may not be fundamentally continuous.

Time as a Human Construct: Some philosophers argue that time is not an objective reality but a human construct. Our perception of time is shaped by our cultural and social contexts, and mechanical clocks are merely tools that we use to organize our experience.

Challenges and Perspectives:

Quantum Mechanics: The probabilistic nature of quantum events challenges the deterministic view of time presented by classical mechanics. This raises questions about the fundamental nature of time and its relationship to quantum processes.

Time and Consciousness: The relationship between time and consciousness is a complex and ongoing debate. Some argue that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of time, while others believe that time is merely a product of our conscious experience.

The Arrow of Time: The directionality of time, as implied by the second law of thermodynamics, remains a mystery.  There is no definitive explanation for why time flows in one direction and not the other.

The Principles of Mechanic Time are a fascinating blend of physics and philosophy. While mechanical clocks provide a practical means of measuring time, they also raise profound questions about the nature of time itself. The ongoing exploration of these questions continues to challenge our understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Time as a Measurement:

The Problem of Simultaneity: Relativity teaches us that events that appear simultaneous in one frame of reference might not be simultaneous in another. This challenges the very notion of a universal “now” and raises questions about the accuracy of mechanical clocks in different frames of reference.

The Limits of Precision: Mechanical clocks, despite their advancements, have inherent limitations in their accuracy.  Even the most precise atomic clocks have a finite level of precision, highlighting the inherent fuzziness of time measurement.

Time and Information:  Information theory suggests that the flow of time is inextricably linked to the flow of information.  The more information we have about a system, the more precise our measurement of time becomes.

Time as a Flow:

The Continuum vs. Discreteness: Is time a continuous flow, like a river, or is it composed of discrete units, like individual frames in a movie?

This question has implications for our understanding of the nature of time and its relationship to quantum mechanics.

The Experience of Time: Our subjective experience of time is highly variable, influenced by factors like our emotional state, age, and the environment. This subjective experience often differs from the objective measurement of time provided by mechanical clocks.

The “Now” and the “Present”: The concept of the “now” is a philosophical enigma. Does the “now” have a fixed duration, or is it an infinitely small point in time? 

The “present” is also a complex concept, encompassing both our immediate experience and our memories of the past.

Time and Consciousness:

The “Mind’s Eye” of Time: Some philosophers argue that consciousness is the fundamental basis of time. We experience time through our consciousness, and our perception of time is shaped by our thoughts, memories, and expectations.

The “Arrow of Consciousness”: Our conscious experience of time is always moving forward, never backward. This “arrow of consciousness” may be a fundamental aspect of our being, and it may be closely linked to the “arrow of time” in the physical world.

Time and Free Will: The relationship between time and free will is a long-standing philosophical debate. If time is deterministic, does that mean our choices are predetermined? Or is there a role for free will in shaping the flow of time?

The Arrow of Time:

The “Entropy Gradient”: The second law of thermodynamics suggests that entropy always increases in a closed system. This “entropy gradient” may be the underlying cause of the arrow of time, but it doesn’t fully explain why time flows in one direction.

The Cosmological Arrow of Time: The expansion of the universe also points to a directionality of time. The universe is expanding from a hot, dense state to a cooler, more dispersed state, suggesting a forward direction for time.

The “Quantum Arrow of Time”: Some theories in quantum mechanics suggest that the arrow of time may be linked to the collapse of the wave function, a fundamental process in quantum measurement. These are just a few of the many intriguing questions and perspectives surrounding the theory and philosophy of Principles of Mechanic Time. The exploration of these concepts continues to challenge and inspire us, as we seek to understand the nature of time and our place within it.

Time and Information:

The “Clockwork Universe” vs.  Information: The idea of a “clockwork universe,” where everything is predetermined, has been challenged by the rise of information theory.  Information, rather than just physical laws, plays a crucial role in shaping the universe. This suggests that time might be more dynamic and less deterministic than previously thought.

Information and the Arrow of Time: The flow of information might be intrinsically linked to the arrow of time. As information is processed and exchanged, it creates a “history” that defines the direction of time. This concept is closely related to the idea of “computational time,” where time is measured in terms of the number of computational steps required to complete a task.

The “Thermodynamic Arrow of Time” and Information: The second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy always increases, can be interpreted in terms of information loss. As a system becomes more disordered, it loses information. This loss of information might be the fundamental reason for the arrow of time.

Time and Consciousness:

The “Subjective Arrow of Time”: Our subjective experience of time is always moving forward, but this doesn’t necessarily mean that time itself is inherently directional.  The “subjective arrow of time” could be a product of our consciousness, shaped by our memories, expectations, and the way our brains process information.

The “Now” and the “Self”: The concept of the “now” is closely tied to our sense of self. We experience the “now” as a point of awareness, a moment where we are conscious of ourselves and our surroundings. This sense of “now” is constantly shifting, creating a continuous stream of experience that we perceive as the flow of time.

Time and Memory: Memory plays a crucial role in our perception of time. We remember the past, and we anticipate the future, both of which shape our experience of the present moment. Without memory, our experience of time would be radically different.

The Arrow of Time:

The “Cosmological Constant” and Time: The cosmological constant, which represents a kind of energy density in the vacuum of space, might have a role in the directionality of time. The constant’s value could influence the expansion of the universe and the overall “flow” of time.

The “Quantum Vacuum” and Time: The quantum vacuum, a state of lowest energy in quantum mechanics, might also play a role in the arrow of time. Fluctuations in the quantum vacuum could create a “background noise” that influences the direction of time.

The “Many-Worlds Interpretation” and Time: The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that every possible outcome of a quantum event occurs in a separate universe. This raises questions about the nature of time in these parallel universes and whether they all experience time in the same direction.

These are just a few more examples of the complex and fascinating questions surrounding Principles of Mechanic Time. As we continue to explore these concepts, we gain a deeper understanding of the universe and our place within it.

Time and the Nature of Reality:

The “Block Universe” and Time: Some physicists and philosophers propose a “block universe” model, where all of time exists simultaneously, like a four-dimensional block.  This view challenges the idea of a flowing time and suggests that our experience of time is merely an illusion.

The “Eternal Now” and Timelessness: The concept of an “eternal now” suggests that all moments of time exist simultaneously, and there is no true past or future. This view often leads to a sense of timelessness and the interconnectedness of all events.

Time and Quantum Entanglement: Quantum entanglement, where two particles are linked even when separated by vast distances, raises questions about the nature of time and its relationship to non-local phenomena. Could entanglement be a way to “communicate” across time?

Time and the Human Experience:

Time and Memory: Our memories are not just recordings of the past; they are actively constructed and reconstructed by our brains. This process of memory formation and recall shapes our experience of time, creating a subjective narrative of our lives. Time and Emotion: Our emotions can dramatically alter our perception of time. Time can seem to slow down during moments of intense joy or fear, or it can speed up when we are bored or distracted. Time and Culture: Different cultures have different conceptions of time. Some cultures emphasize linear time, while others prioritize cyclical time. These cultural differences influence how people perceive and experience time.

Time and the Future:

The “Future is Not Fixed”: While the past is fixed, the future is not predetermined. Our actions and choices can influence the course of events, creating a dynamic and unpredictable future.

The “Many Futures” and Time Travel: The concept of “many futures” suggests that there are multiple possible paths for the future, each branching off from a different decision point. This raises the intriguing possibility of time travel, although the feasibility of such a concept remains highly debated.

The “End of Time” and the Heat Death of the Universe: Some theories suggest that the universe will eventually reach a state of maximum entropy, known as the “heat death,” where all energy is evenly distributed and time effectively ceases to exist.

Time and the Unknowable:

The “Ultimate Mystery” of Time: Despite all our scientific and philosophical inquiries, the nature of time remains a profound mystery. The fundamental questions about the nature of time, its directionality, and its relationship to consciousness continue to challenge our understanding of the universe.

The “Timeless Perspective”: Some spiritual traditions suggest that time is an illusion and that we can transcend our experience of time through meditation, contemplation, or other practices. This “timeless perspective” offers a different way of understanding the nature of reality and our place within it. The exploration of time is an ongoing journey, filled with wonder, mystery, and endless possibilities. As we continue to delve into these concepts, we may uncover new insights into the nature of reality and the human experience.

Time and the Limits of Measurement:

The “Planck Time” and the Quantum Realm: Planck time, the smallest unit of time that can be meaningfully measured, is approximately 5.39 × 10^-44 seconds. At this scale, the very concept of time becomes fuzzy, and our classical understanding of time breaks down.

The “Zero Point Energy” and Time Fluctuations: Quantum mechanics suggests that even in a vacuum, there is a non-zero amount of energy, known as “zero-point energy.” This energy can cause fluctuations in the fabric of space-time, potentially leading to variations in the flow of time.

The “Time Arrow” and the “Quantum Zeno Effect”: The “Quantum Zeno Effect” suggests that frequent observation of a quantum system can prevent its evolution. This phenomenon raises questions about the relationship between observation, measurement, and the flow of time.

Time and the Philosophy of Language:

The “Linguistic Turn” and Time: The “linguistic turn” in philosophy emphasizes the importance of language in shaping our understanding of reality. Our concepts of time are shaped by the language we use to describe it, and different languages may have different ways of conceptualizing time.

The “Metaphysics of Time” and Language: The way we talk about time can reveal our underlying assumptions about its nature. For example, we often use metaphors like “time is a river” or “time is a thief,” which reflect our cultural and philosophical perspectives on time.

The “Problem of Time” in Physics: The “problem of time” in physics refers to the difficulty of reconciling our classical understanding of time with the quantum nature of reality.  This problem may be rooted in the limitations of language to describe the fundamental nature of time.

Time and the Search for a Unified Theory: The “Theory of Everything” and Time: A “theory of everything” would aim to unify all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. Such a theory would likely have profound implications for our understanding of time and its relationship to other fundamental concepts like space and energy.

The “Quantum Gravity” and Time: Quantum gravity, a theory that attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics with general relativity, is likely to shed new light on the nature of time. It may reveal that time is not a fundamental entity but rather an emergent property of the quantum realm.

The “Holographic Principle” and Time: The “holographic principle” suggests that the universe can be described as a two-dimensional surface, with all information encoded on this surface. This principle raises questions about the nature of time and whether it is a fundamental property of the universe or an emergent property of the holographic surface.

Time and the Beyond:

The “Transcendental Time” and the “Eternal Now”: Some spiritual and philosophical traditions suggest that there is a “transcendental time” or an “eternal now” that transcends our ordinary experience of time. This concept raises questions about the nature of consciousness, the limits of human perception, and the possibility of experiencing time in a different way.

The “Timeless Mind” and the “Unification of Time”: Some mystical traditions suggest that the mind can transcend time and experience a state of “timelessness.” This state of mind may be characterized by a sense of unity with the universe and a transcendence of the limitations of our ordinary experience of time.

The exploration of time is a journey that takes us to the very edges of our understanding, challenging our assumptions about reality and pushing us to explore new frontiers of knowledge.

Time and the Nature of Reality: A Deeper Dive

The “Many-Worlds Interpretation” and Time: We briefly touched on this before, but it deserves further exploration. The many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that every quantum measurement creates a split in the universe, with each possible outcome occurring in a separate, parallel world. This raises profound questions about the nature of time in these parallel universes. Do they all experience time in the same direction? 

Do they have the same “arrow of time”? 

Or could time itself be different in each world?

The “Eternal Return” and Time as a Cycle: The concept of the “eternal return,” popularized by Friedrich Nietzsche, suggests that time is cyclical, and all events will eventually repeat themselves. This idea challenges the linear view of time and raises questions about the meaning of our lives and the nature of free will.  If everything repeats, does our agency truly matter?

The “Timeless Perspective” and the “Unification of Time”: Some spiritual traditions suggest that time is an illusion and that we can transcend our experience of time through meditation, contemplation, or other practices. This “timeless perspective” offers a different way of understanding the nature of reality and our place within it. It suggests that the “now” is all that truly exists, and that our experience of time is a product of our limited perception.

Time and the Limits of Human Understanding

The “Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems” and Time: Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, which demonstrate the inherent limitations of formal systems, have implications for our understanding of time. They suggest that there may be aspects of time that are inherently unknowable to us, even with the most sophisticated mathematical and scientific tools.

The “Anthropic Principle” and Time: The anthropic principle suggests that the universe is fine-tuned for the existence of life.  This principle raises questions about the role of time in the grand scheme of things. Is time a fundamental property of the universe, or is it an emergent property that arose because it was necessary for the development of life?

The “Ultimate Mystery” of Time: Despite all our scientific and philosophical inquiries, the nature of time remains a profound mystery. The fundamental questions about the nature of time, its directionality, and its relationship to consciousness continue to challenge our understanding of the universe. Perhaps the ultimate mystery of time is that it is beyond our full comprehension.

Time and the Future of Knowledge

The “Singularity” and the Future of Time: The “singularity,” a hypothetical point in the future where technological advancement becomes uncontrollable and unpredictable, raises questions about the nature of time in a post-singularity world. Could technology fundamentally alter our experience of time, or even allow us to manipulate it?

The “Quantum Computer” and Time: Quantum computers, which harness the principles of quantum mechanics to perform calculations, may revolutionize our understanding of time. They could allow us to simulate time at a level of detail that is currently impossible, potentially leading to new insights into the nature of time itself.

The “Cosmic Consciousness” and Time: Some futurists speculate that humanity may eventually evolve into a state of “cosmic consciousness,” where we transcend our individual limitations and gain access to a higher level of understanding, potentially including a deeper understanding of time.

The exploration of time is an ongoing journey, filled with wonder, mystery, and endless possibilities. As we continue to delve into these concepts, we may uncover new insights into the nature of reality and the human experience.

Time and the Nature of Reality: A Deeper Dive (Part 2)

The “Multiverse” and Time: Building upon the “many-worlds interpretation,” the concept of a “multiverse” suggests that there are an infinite number of parallel universes, each with its own unique set of physical laws and possibly even different conceptions of time.

Could there be universes where time flows backward, or where time is cyclical? 

Could there be universes where time doesn’t exist at all?

The “Quantum Foam” and Time Fluctuations: Quantum mechanics suggests that the fabric of space-time is not smooth but rather a “quantum foam” of tiny fluctuations.  These fluctuations could potentially lead to variations in the flow of time at very small scales, perhaps even creating “time bubbles” where time flows differently.

The “Timeless Point of View” and the “Observer Effect”: Some physicists and philosophers argue that time is a product of our perception, and that from a “timeless point of view,” all moments of time exist simultaneously. This idea is related to the “observer effect” in quantum mechanics, where the act of observation influences the state of a quantum system. 

Could our consciousness be influencing the flow of time?

Time and the Human Experience: A Deeper Look

The “Flow of Time” and the “Present Moment”: Our experience of time is not a constant flow but rather a series of discrete moments, each with its own unique quality. The “present moment” is a fleeting and elusive concept, but it is also the only moment that truly exists. Learning to focus on the present moment is a key to living a more mindful and fulfilling life.

The “Time Warp” and the “Subjective Experience of Time”:  Our perception of time is highly subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors, including our emotions, our age, and our environment. Time can seem to slow down during moments of intense excitement or fear, or it can speed up when we are bored or distracted. This “time warp” is a testament to the plasticity of our minds and the way our brains construct our experience of time.

The “Timeless State” and the “Transcendence of Time”: Some spiritual traditions suggest that it is possible to achieve a state of “timelessness” through meditation, contemplation, or other practices.  In this state, the mind transcends the limitations of time and experiences a sense of unity with the universe.

Time and the Future of Knowledge: A Glimpse into the Unknown

The “Quantum Entanglement” and Time Travel: Quantum entanglement, where two particles are linked even when separated by vast distances, raises questions about the nature of time and its relationship to non-local phenomena.  Could entanglement be a way to “communicate” across time, or even a stepping stone to time travel?

The “Artificial Intelligence” and Time: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly advancing, and it is possible that AI could eventually surpass human intelligence.  Could AI develop a deeper understanding of time than we currently have, or even create new forms of time-based technologies?

The “Cosmic Consciousness” and the “Unification of Time”:  Some futurists speculate that humanity may eventually evolve into a state of “cosmic consciousness,” where we transcend our individual limitations and gain access to a higher level of understanding, potentially including a deeper understanding of time. Could this state of consciousness allow us to perceive time in a way that is currently unimaginable?

The exploration of time is a journey that takes us to the very edges of our understanding, challenging our assumptions about reality and pushing us to explore new frontiers of knowledge. As we continue to delve into these concepts, we may uncover new insights into the nature of reality and the human experience.

Time and the Fabric of Reality:

The “Quantum Gravity” and Time as an Illusion: Quantum gravity, a theory that aims to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggests that time might not be a fundamental entity but rather an emergent property of the quantum realm. In this view, time could be an illusion, a product of our limited perception of the universe.

The “Holographic Principle” and Time as a Projection: The holographic principle suggests that the universe can be described as a two-dimensional surface, with all information encoded on this surface. This could mean that time is not a fundamental property of the universe but rather a projection of this holographic surface.

The “String Theory” and Time as a Dimension: String theory, a theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the forces of nature, suggests that time might be a dimension, just like space. This would mean that time is not a linear flow but rather a continuous dimension that we can move through, potentially allowing for time travel.

Time and the Limits of Human Perception:

The “Timeless Now” and the “Flow of Consciousness”: Some philosophers argue that the “now” is the only moment that truly exists, and that our experience of time is a product of our consciousness. This suggests that time is not a fixed entity but rather a continuous flow of consciousness, a stream of awareness that we perceive as time.

The “Timeless State” and the “Transcendence of Time”:  We’ve touched on this before, but it’s worth revisiting. Some spiritual traditions suggest that it is possible to achieve a state of “timelessness” through meditation, contemplation, or other practices.  In this state, the mind transcends the limitations of time and experiences a sense of unity with the universe.

The “Timeless Perspective” and the “Unification of Time”: 

This concept suggests that from a “timeless perspective,” all moments of time exist simultaneously, and there is no true past or future.  This view challenges the linear view of time and suggests that our experience of time is merely an illusion.

Time and the Future of Existence: The “Heat Death of the Universe” and the End of Time: Some theories suggest that the universe will eventually reach a state of maximum entropy, known as the “heat death,” where all energy is evenly distributed and time effectively ceases to exist. This raises questions about the ultimate fate of the universe and the meaning of time.

The “Big Crunch” and Time Reversal: Another cosmological theory suggests that the universe will eventually collapse back on itself in a “Big Crunch.” If this happens, could time reverse itself, leading to a scenario where the future becomes the past?

The “Multiverse” and the “Eternal Now”: The concept of a multiverse, with an infinite number of parallel universes, could also imply an “eternal now,” where all moments of time exist simultaneously. This would mean that time is not a linear flow but rather a vast and interconnected tapestry of all possible moments.

Time and the Unknowable:

The “Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems” and Time: Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, which demonstrate the inherent limitations of formal systems, have implications for our understanding of time. They suggest that there may be aspects of time that are inherently unknowable to us, even with the most sophisticated mathematical and scientific tools.

The “Anthropic Principle” and Time: The anthropic principle suggests that the universe is fine-tuned for the existence of life. This principle raises questions about the role of time in the grand scheme of things. Is time a fundamental property of the universe, or is it an emergent property that arose because it was necessary for the development of life?

The “Ultimate Mystery” of Time: Despite all our scientific and philosophical inquiries, the nature of time remains a profound mystery. The fundamental questions about the nature of time, its directionality, and its relationship to consciousness continue to challenge our understanding of the universe.  Perhaps the ultimate mystery of time is that it is beyond our full comprehension.

The exploration of time is a journey that takes us to the very edges of our understanding, challenging our assumptions about reality and pushing us to explore new frontiers of knowledge. As we continue to delve into these concepts, we may uncover new insights into the nature of reality and the human experience.

Time and the Nature of Consciousness:

The “Subjective Arrow of Time” and the “Flow of Consciousness”: We’ve touched on this before, but it’s worth revisiting. Our experience of time is not a constant flow but rather a series of discrete moments, each with its own unique quality. The “present moment” is a fleeting and elusive concept, but it is also the only moment that truly exists. Learning to focus on the present moment is a key to living a more mindful and fulfilling life. Could our consciousness be creating the illusion of a linear flow of time?

The “Timeless State” and the “Transcendence of Time”: Some spiritual traditions suggest that it is possible to achieve a state of “timelessness” through meditation, contemplation, or other practices. In this state, the mind transcends the limitations of time and experiences a sense of unity with the universe.

Could this state be a glimpse into the true nature of time, beyond our limited perception?

The “Observer Effect” and the Role of Consciousness: The “observer effect” in quantum mechanics suggests that the act of observation influences the state of a quantum system.

Could our consciousness be influencing the flow of time in a similar way?

Could our awareness be shaping the very fabric of reality, including our experience of time?

Time and the Unification of Physics: The “Theory of Everything” and Time as a Dimension: A “theory of everything” would aim to unify all the fundamental forces of nature, including gravity. Such a theory would likely have profound implications for our understanding of time and its relationship to other fundamental concepts like space and energy. 

Could time be a dimension, just like space, in a unified theory?

The “Quantum Gravity” and Time as an Illusion: Quantum gravity, a theory that attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics with general relativity, is likely to shed new light on the nature of time. It may reveal that time is not a fundamental entity but rather an emergent property of the quantum realm.

Could time be an illusion, a product of our limited perception of the universe?

The “String Theory” and Time as a Dimension: String theory, a theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the forces of nature, suggests that time might be a dimension, just like space. This would mean that time is not a linear flow but rather a continuous dimension that we can move through, potentially allowing for time travel.

Time and the Limits of Language:

The “Linguistic Turn” and Time: The “linguistic turn” in philosophy emphasizes the importance of language in shaping our understanding of reality. Our concepts of time are shaped by the language we use to describe it, and different languages may have different ways of conceptualizing time.

Could our language be limiting our understanding of time?

The “Metaphysics of Time” and Language: The way we talk about time can reveal our underlying assumptions about its nature. For example, we often use metaphors like “time is a river” or “time is a thief,” which reflect our cultural and philosophical perspectives on time.

Could these metaphors be hindering our ability to grasp the true nature of time?

The “Problem of Time” in Physics: The “problem of time” in physics refers to the difficulty of reconciling our classical understanding of time with the quantum nature of reality.  This problem may be rooted in the limitations of language to describe the fundamental nature of time.

Could we need a new language to understand time more fully?

Time and the Beyond:

The “Transcendental Time” and the “Eternal Now”: Some spiritual and philosophical traditions suggest that there is a “transcendental time” or an “eternal now” that transcends our ordinary experience of time. This concept raises questions about the nature of consciousness, the limits of human perception, and the possibility of experiencing time in a different way.

The “Timeless Mind” and the “Unification of Time”: Some mystical traditions suggest that the mind can transcend time and experience a state of “timelessness.” This state of mind may be characterized by a sense of unity with the universe and a transcendence of the limitations of our ordinary experience of time.

Objective Measurement: One of the fundamental principles of mechanical time is its objective nature. Mechanical timekeeping devices provide a standardized and measurable representation of time. It allows for precise synchronization and coordination of activities, making it an essential aspect of modern society.

Regularity and Repetition: Principles of Mechanic Time relies on the regular and repetitive motion of mechanical components, such as the oscillation of a pendulum or the rotation of gears. These consistent movements are used to create a uniform and predictable measurement of time.

Linearity: Principles of Mechanic Time is often represented as a linear progression, where time flows continuously and uniformly. This concept is closely related to the idea of time as a one-dimensional quantity that progresses from past to present to future.

Time as Quantity: In the context of mechanical time, time is often treated as a quantifiable entity that can be divided into smaller units, such as seconds, minutes, and hours. This understanding of time as a measurable quantity has practical implications for various fields, including science, engineering, and everyday life.

From a philosophical perspective, the Principles of Mechanic Time raise interesting questions and debates:

The Nature of Time: Philosophers have long debated the nature of time. Mechanical timekeeping devices provide a practical and measurable representation of time, but they do not necessarily capture the full complexity of temporal experience. The subjective aspects of time, such as its perception and subjective duration, are still subjects of philosophical inquiry.

Determinism vs. Free Will: The regular and predictable nature of mechanical time raises questions related to determinism and free will. If time unfolds according to fixed mechanical principles, does it imply a deterministic worldview where events are predetermined?

Alternatively, can individuals exercise free will within the framework of mechanical time?

Temporal Experience: Mechanical timekeeping devices provide an external reference for measuring time, but they do not capture the subjective experience of time. Philosophical discussions explore the relationship between objective mechanical time and the individual’s subjective experience of time, including the phenomenon of time dilation and the relativity of temporal perception.

Temporal Ontology: Principles of Mechanic Time raises questions about the ontology of time itself. Is time an objective feature of the universe, or is it a construct of human perception and measurement?

Philosophical perspectives range from time being an intrinsic aspect of reality to time being a human invention for temporal ordering. The Principles of Mechanic Time, It encompasses discussions about the nature of time, determinism vs. free will, temporal experience, and the ontology of time.

Standardization and Temporal Coordination: Mechanical timekeeping devices have played a crucial role in standardizing time across different regions and facilitating temporal coordination. The establishment of time zones and the adoption of coordinated universal time (UTC) are examples of how mechanical time has been used to synchronize activities on a global scale.

Time as a Commodity: The development of precise mechanical timekeeping devices coincided with the rise of industrialization and capitalism. Time became a valuable commodity, and mechanical timekeeping allowed for more efficient scheduling of labor, production, and transportation. This perspective raises questions about the relationship between time, productivity, and the commodification of human activities.

Temporal Accuracy and Reliability: Mechanical timekeeping devices strive for accuracy and reliability, aiming to measure time as precisely as possible. However, they are still subject to various factors that can affect their accuracy, such as temperature variations, mechanical wear, or external influences. These limitations raise philosophical questions about the nature of precision, the relationship between accuracy and subjective experience, and the implications of potential errors in time measurement.

Temporal Linearity and Non-linearity: While mechanical time is often represented as linear and uniform, there are phenomena in the natural world that challenge this perception. For instance, in relativistic physics, the concept of space-time incorporates non-linear aspects, such as time dilation near massive objects or the distortion of time in the presence of high velocities. These concepts challenge the purely linear understanding of time and invite philosophical reflections on the nature of time’s relationship to space and motion.

Time and Consciousness: Mechanical timekeeping devices raise questions about the relationship between time and human consciousness. The experience of time can vary depending on our subjective states, such as boredom, anticipation, or flow states. Philosophical discussions explore how the objective measurement of time relates to our subjective experience of its passing and the role of consciousness in shaping our temporal perception.

Time and Existence: The nature of time raises philosophical questions about its connection to existence and reality. Some philosophical perspectives argue that time is fundamental to the fabric of the universe, while others propose that time is an emergent phenomenon or even an illusion. The Principles of Mechanic Time provide a framework to examine these ontological questions and explore the interplay between time, being, and the nature of reality.

Temporal Order and Causality: Mechanical timekeeping devices contribute to the establishment of temporal order and the understanding of causality. By measuring time with precision, they allow us to sequence events, determine cause and effect relationships, and make predictions about the future. This aspect raises philosophical questions about the nature of causality, the directionality of time, and the role of temporal order in our understanding of the world.

Time and Human Perception: The Principles of Mechanic Time provides an external reference point for measuring time, but it does not capture the full complexity of human temporal perception. Our experience of time is influenced by various factors, such as attention, memory, and emotional states. Philosophical discussions delve into the relationship between objective mechanical time and the subjective experience of its passage, including debates on the nature of the “present” moment and the potential existence of multiple temporal perspectives.

Time and Change: Mechanical timekeeping devices are intimately linked to the concept of change. Time allows us to measure and quantify the rate at which events occur and objects transform. Philosophical explorations of time and change involve discussions on the nature of becoming, the distinction between time and space, and the role of time in processes of growth, decay, and evolution.

Time and Identity: Mechanical timekeeping devices contribute to our understanding of personal and historical identity. They allow us to mark important milestones, record events, and create narratives of the past. Philosophical inquiries into time and identity touch on questions about the continuity of the self over time, the role of memory in shaping personal identity, and the impact of historical narratives on collective identity.

Time and Ethics: The Principles of Mechanic Time have ethical implications. The measurement and organization of time influence our sense of responsibility, punctuality, and the allocation of resources. Philosophical discussions explore the ethical dimensions of time, such as the value of leisure, the impact of time constraints on well-being, and the ethical implications of temporal inequalities.

Time and the Philosophy of Science: The Principles of Mechanic Time are intertwined with the philosophy of science, particularly in fields such as physics and cosmology. Time plays a central role in scientific theories, such as the laws of motion, quantum mechanics, and theories of space-time. Philosophical investigations into the nature of time in science address topics like the arrow of time, the nature of time in different physical theories, and the challenges of reconciling subjective experience with scientific descriptions of time.

Time and Temporal Paradoxes: Mechanical timekeeping devices raise intriguing questions related to temporal paradoxes. Concepts like time travel, causality loops, and the grandfather paradox challenge our intuitive understanding of time’s linearity. Philosophical discussions explore the implications of these paradoxes, probing the nature of time’s arrow, the possibility of changing the past, and the coherence of time travel scenarios.

Time and Subjectivity: While mechanical time provides an objective measure of time, it does not capture the subjective experience of time. Philosophical inquiries delve into the subjective aspects of time, including the perception of time’s passage, the existential dimensions of temporality, and the role of time in shaping our narratives of personal and cultural identity.

Time and Aesthetics: Mechanical timekeeping devices have influenced artistic expressions and aesthetics. The concept of rhythm, for instance, finds its roots in the regularity and repetition of the Principles of Mechanic Time. The interplay between time and aesthetics leads to philosophical questions about the nature of temporal art forms, the experience of time in artistic encounters, and the relationship between time and beauty.

Time’s Relationship to Space and Matter: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with philosophical inquiries into the nature of space and matter. The concept of space-time, as described by Einstein’s theory of general relativity, suggests an intimate connection between time, space, and the distribution of matter and energy. Philosophical explorations tackle questions about the nature of space-time, the implications of time’s curvature, and the role of time in cosmological models.

Time and Mortality: Mechanical timekeeping devices remind us of our mortality and the fleeting nature of existence. The ticking of a clock serves as a reminder of time’s relentless march forward. Philosophical reflections on time and mortality delve into the existential dimensions of temporality, the significance of time’s finitude, and the quest for meaning in the face of impermanence.

Time and Language: The Principles of Mechanic Time are intertwined with language and linguistic expressions. The use of temporal terms and concepts, such as past, present, future, duration, and interval, are deeply embedded in our linguistic frameworks. Philosophical inquiries explore the relationship between language and time, the role of language in shaping our temporal understanding, and the challenges of expressing the ineffable aspects of time through words.

Time and Memory: Mechanical timekeeping devices play a role in our relationship with the past through the measurement and organization of time. They aid in the formation of personal and collective memories by providing a framework for recording and recalling events. Philosophical discussions explore the intricate connection between time and memory, addressing topics such as the reliability of memory, the selective nature of remembering, and the role of memory in shaping our sense of personal and historical identity.

Time and Temporal Perspectives: The Principles of Mechanic Time often assume a universal and objective perspective. However, different cultures and individuals may have distinct temporal perspectives influenced by social, cultural, and personal factors. Philosophical inquiries examine the diversity of temporal perspectives, the ways in which they shape our understanding of time, and the implications for cross-cultural interactions and perspectives on history.

Time and Technology: Mechanical timekeeping devices have been instrumental in the development and advancement of technology. The synchronization of time across different devices and systems enables complex technological processes. Philosophical explorations touch on the relationship between time and technology, raising questions about the impact of technology on our experience and perception of time, the role of technology in shaping our temporal rhythms, and the potential consequences of technological advancements for our understanding of time.

Time and Temporal Boundaries: The Principles of Mechanic Time provide a framework for delineating temporal boundaries, such as the start and end of events, appointments, or durations. Philosophical discussions examine the nature of temporal boundaries and address questions about their objectivity, subjectivity, and the cultural and contextual factors that shape our understanding and negotiation of these boundaries.

Time and Human Agency: Mechanical timekeeping devices influence our sense of agency and control over time. They provide a structure within which we allocate and manage our activities. Philosophical inquiries explore the relationship between time and human agency, investigating questions about the extent to which we are bound by the constraints of Principles of Mechanic Time and the possibilities for exercising agency within the temporal framework provided by such devices.

Time and the Sublime: The Principles of Mechanic Time can evoke a sense of the sublime—the experience of awe, wonder, and transcendence. The precise and rhythmic motion of clock mechanisms, for example, can elicit aesthetic and emotional responses. Philosophical reflections on time and the sublime delve into the intersection of aesthetics, emotion, and the experience of time, exploring how the sublime can be evoked through encounters with mechanical timekeeping devices.

Time and Existential Philosophy: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with existential philosophy, which explores the nature of human existence and the experience of being in the world. Philosophical inquiries consider how our awareness of time’s passage, our mortality, and the finitude of human existence shape our understanding of ourselves and our search for meaning. The concepts of “temporality” and “authenticity” in existentialism delve into the relationship between time and our lived experiences.

Time and Temporal Paradoxes in Physics: The Principles of Mechanic Time also relate to temporal paradoxes that emerge from scientific theories, especially within the realm of quantum mechanics and theories of time travel. Philosophical discussions delve into the nature of time in these scientific frameworks, examining concepts such as time dilation, time reversal, and the potential for closed time like curves. These paradoxes challenge our common-sense understanding of time and prompt philosophical reflections on the nature of causality, determinism, and the possibility of altering the past.

Time and the Philosophy of Mind: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with the philosophy of mind, particularly in discussions on the subjective experience of time. Philosophical inquiries delve into questions about the relationship between time and consciousness, addressing topics such as the perception of time’s passage, the sense of temporal flow, and the potential influence of subjective mental states on our experience of time. These discussions engage with theories of temporality, such as the “specious present” and the role of memory in shaping temporal experiences.

Time and Social Constructs: The Principles of Mechanic Time are intimately tied to social and cultural constructs. The measurement and organization of time shape societal structures, including systems of work, education, and transportation. Philosophical investigations explore how these constructs influence our understanding of time’s value, the impact of temporal norms on individual well-being, and the potential for alternative temporal frameworks that challenge traditional notions of time.

Time and the Philosophy of Language: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with the philosophy of language, particularly in discussions on temporal language and the expression of temporal concepts. Philosophical inquiries explore the relationship between language and time, addressing questions about the nature of tense, the linguistic representation of temporal relations, and the challenges of communicating nuanced temporal experiences through language.

Time and Temporal Ontology: The Principles of Mechanic Time raise questions about the ontology of time itself. Philosophical debates explore various theories of time, including presentism (the view that only the present moment exists), externalism (the view that past, present, and future all exist), and the growing block universe (the view that the past and present exist, but the future is open). These discussions delve into the nature of temporal becoming, the reality of the past and future, and the implications for our understanding of time’s flow.

Time and Temporal Synchrony: Mechanical timekeeping devices have played a crucial role in establishing temporal synchrony among individuals and societies. They enable coordinated activities, such as transportation schedules, global communication, and shared cultural events. Philosophical inquiries explore the implications of temporal synchrony for social cohesion, the construction of shared realities, and the challenges posed by temporal asynchrony in a globalized world.

Time and Temporal Perception Disorders: The Principles of Mechanic Time provide a reference point for understanding temporal perception disorders, such as chronostasis, time dilation, or temporal lobe epilepsy. Philosophical discussions delve into the nature of these disorders, examining how they influence our experience of time, challenge the reliability of Principles of Mechanic Time measurement, and raise questions about the relationship between subjective temporal experiences and objective time.

Time and Temporal Aesthetics: Mechanical timekeeping devices have influenced artistic expressions and the exploration of temporal aesthetics. Artists have used Principles of Mechanic Time as a subject or medium, incorporating temporal elements into their works. Philosophical inquiries explore the relationship between time and aesthetics, considering how the passage of time, rhythms, and temporal structures can evoke emotional responses, shape artistic experiences, and challenge traditional notions of artistic temporality.

Time and Temporal Justice: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with discussions on temporal justice and fairness. Concepts such as “time served” in legal contexts or debates about distributive justice raise questions about the allocation and valuation of time. Philosophical investigations examine the ethical dimensions of time distribution, the impact of temporal inequalities on social structures, and the potential for alternative conceptions of temporal justice.

Time and Temporality in Indigenous Cultures: The Principles of Mechanic Time provide a contrast to temporal conceptions in indigenous cultures, which often emphasize cyclical or event-based understandings of time. Philosophical discussions explore the diversity of temporal frameworks and challenge the assumption that mechanical time is universal. They also shed light on the cultural significance of time, temporal rhythms tied to natural phenomena, and the relationship between humans and the temporal dimensions of their environments.

Time and Temporal Responsibility: The Principles of Mechanic Time raise questions about temporal responsibility and accountability. Temporal frameworks influence our obligations, deadlines, and the consequences of delayed actions. Philosophical inquiries delve into the moral dimensions of time, examining the relationship between time management, the fulfillment of obligations, and the impact of temporal choices on personal and collective well-being.

Time and Temporal Paradoxes in Philosophy: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with philosophical discussions on temporal paradoxes beyond the realm of physics. Paradoxes such as the “arrow of time” paradox, the “ship of Theseus” paradox, or the “grandfather paradox” challenge our intuitions about the nature of time and raise questions about identity, change, and causality. Philosophical inquiries delve into these paradoxes, exploring different resolutions and their implications for our understanding of time and existence.

Time and Temporal Hermeneutics: The Principles of Mechanic Time relate to the field of hermeneutics, which is concerned with the interpretation of texts and meaning-making. Temporal hermeneutics considers how the understanding and interpretation of texts are influenced by temporal contexts, historical perspectives, and the changing understanding of time itself. Philosophical discussions explore the role of temporality in the interpretation of literature, historical documents, and cultural artifacts.

Time and Temporal Dimensions in Mathematics: The Principles of Mechanic Time have connections to the philosophy of mathematics, particularly in discussions on the nature of time in mathematical models. Philosophical inquiries examine the notion of “mathematical time,” exploring how time is conceptualized and represented in mathematical frameworks, and how mathematical models can capture temporal phenomena and dynamics.

Time and Temporal Experience in Virtual Reality: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with the realm of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), where temporal experiences can be manipulated and altered. Philosophical discussions explore the implications of VR and AR technologies on our perception of time, the blurring of boundaries between real and virtual temporalities, and the potential for transformative experiences of time in immersive virtual environments.

Time and Temporal Fluidity: The Principles of Mechanic Time raise questions about the nature of temporal fluidity and its implications. Temporal fluidity refers to the malleability and variability of time, which can be experienced subjectively or influenced by external factors. Philosophical inquiries delve into the philosophical implications of temporal fluidity, considering its relationship to free will, personal agency, and the nature of reality itself.

Time and Temporal Ecologies: The Principles of Mechanic Time intersect with discussions on temporal ecologies, which explore the interconnections between temporal rhythms, natural environments, and human experiences. Philosophical investigations examine how the principles of mechanical time impact our relationship with natural cycles, our understanding of ecological time, and the potential consequences of temporal misalignments within ecological systems.

 
Philosophy is a deep thinking in the interpretation of operations carried out in the unknown.
Trust science and philosophy.
Author: Principles of Mechanic Time is a real scientific theory and has a fundamental philosophy that if it is accepted in scientific and philosophical societies, the world will change, and if not, I will change, and in both cases, I am the winner.

Sincerely
Professor Abdolreza Shahrabi Farahani
The End