Principles of Mechanic Time

Book Title: Principles of Mechanic Time
Author: Professor Abdolreza Shahrabi Farahani
Based on: Philosophy of Subjective Physics
Based on Theories in Oriental Science and Philosophy
Explaining the Nature, Structure and Components of Space and Time
And the Oriental Medicine Science and Philosophy and elementary particles
Journey into the Depths of Time: Genesis
Book start date: 09 / August / 2006
Book completion date: May 15, 2017
Review again date: March 25, 2022
ISBN: 978-622-97382-4-5
ISBN DATE: 2022 – FIRST VOLUME OF THREE VOLUME
REGISTERED: NATIONAL LIBRARY AND DOCUMENTATION ORGANIZATION-2022
REGISTERED NO, IN THE NATIONAL LIBRARY: 8783247
Translated to the English by: Prof.Abdolreza Shahrabi Farahani
Book Link in the National library: http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/bibliographic/8783247

Preface by the Author
For centuries, the existence of particles under the title (energy particles or internal particles) has been talked about and points of view have been raised. Just like the topic of time, which after general relativity, it rather became a competition to have a better understanding of time itself and not seconds, minutes and hours. In the midst of the Scientific and Philosophical uproar, a question has not been raised on what the process of thought itself is or can be.
There was no question about how energy particles or life particles work, or how these processes take place, how they work, and where they come from.
Do we have a question in mind, for example about (Michael Faraday) who could not write his name correctly in the second year of elementary school, on how he was able to solve a puzzle that the genius Newton could not?
Or how Newton himself was able to state the laws of motion, matter and energy without obtaining high degrees in the university?
Or how Einstein decisively rejected Newton’s theory about time in his first year of university?
Or did no one raise the question that when Professor Stephen Hawking introduces himself (I am a Physicist and Mathematician and a bit of a Dreamer), what is this dream and where does it come from?
But the main topic in this book is based on examination and function of (particles of life or energy particles) and how they appear from the perspective of the Orient.
Why the Orient? Because these particles, which have been known as (Qi – Ki – Parana) for thousands of years, are oriental, and therefore their investigation has naturally been performed from the perspective of Oriental Sciences and Philosophy.
The theory of Principles of Mechanic Time generally has nothing to do with mechanical science, but is a name to specify the possible way these particles function in the universe and in the human body, which also has basic principles. Therefore, the name Principles of Mechanic Time was chosen for this theory.
Every theory about time is of western origin and from the point of view of these particles, time has not been investigated and no possibilities have been seen, and it has been tried to explain time as much as possible according to the function of these particles and to see if the nature, structure and components of the universe can be obtained by explaining these particles so that we can have a better view.
This can also reveal a better view of the factors and components of fundamental particles if we accept that from this point of view we can also explain time and even the creation of the universe and most importantly, thought itself.
Have we had a correct or complete view about fundamental particles?
Is it possible to explain time or fundamental particles or thought with meditation, or is it possible to create fundamental questions even through this physical and mental process?
Do we really know what happens or can happen in meditation?
Does our brain understand thinking?
Can our brain make a new structure or what it makes has already been dictated by genetic codes?
Were space and time separate and merged after the big bang?
Didn’t we have time before the big bang?
Is time really the result of movement?

Have we calculated the speed of light correctly?
Is there really a mental illness?
We can find the answer to these questions if we can say that we know thinking results from what process or processes.
We must be able to have a logical explanation for the mind in order to be able to say that mental illness exists.
What is this soul that gets ill, or what can this soul be from a scientific or philosophical point of view that leads to a mental illness.
These issues, whether we have an answer for them or not, are not at all simple and we cannot simply pass by them.
Everything that we have had, built and implemented since ancient times is the result of thinking, imagining and dreaming, and we should be able to explain these thinking, imagining and dreaming, or at least have a somewhat better understanding of them.
There was no theory or view, Science, Philosophy, inventions and discoveries that were not the result of thinking, imagination and dreams, but we are still short in the explanation of rational thinking.
We have always been told to use your brain properly, or don’t solve this problem mentally, or use your mind properly, or similar words. But during these discussions, has anyone told us how we think at all or what is thinking itself?
Using the brain correctly means knowing the structure, components and nature of the brain, and it seems that the human brain still has many surprises to discover.
In this book (first and second chapters) topics such as Meditation and famous channels in Acupuncture are mentioned along with an anatomy map and how to use needles but what may not be paid attention to at first glance is that the first and second chapters are a kind of lamp to shine light, to clarify the explanation of how fundamental particles emerged from the perspective of Oriental Sciences and Philosophy and to what extent has this been able to fulfill the author’s dream that it was the result of the action of these particles and that (the resulting thought may be the result of what process).
Do you know someone who has mentioned the possible connection between the actual performance of acupuncture and the theory of parallel worlds or something similar?
Have you seen an image, at least symbolic, about the connection of meditation with space and time?
Do you know a Scientist or a Philosopher who has mentioned a possible image or function about these particles that have been mentioned in the East for thousands of years?
Maybe these particles are of the same nature of matter, can we reject this theory?
Is there no connection to the symbol (Yin and Yang) in the East and general relativity or even Einstein’s special relativity, or its appearance and similarity to the cosmos in this symbol is just a coincidence?
Is space and time related to our diseases on earth?
Do parallel worlds mean the existence of another (me) in the same way in another world? Can’t parallel worlds be just another space and time in which there is no (similar me)?
Can a fetus in a woman’s womb be a suitable model for tracking parallel worlds?
Can what has been called (Meridians or energy channels) for thousands of years in the East lead us to a real discovery and a more logical explanation of parallel worlds?
Here, it is not at all intended to question the efforts of scientists and philosophers, but on the contrary, their efforts are to be continued, which is the way of science and philosophy.
I suggest that you don’t let things like meditation and acupuncture distract you from the nature of the mentioned subjects because they are really related to each other. Stay with Principles of Mechanic Time and look for time in another way, in a more extraordinary and smaller dimension, and maybe scarier, but maybe more real.
This book took about 22 years to be summarized and adapted to other topics, which we will reach in the next editions. For now, we will take a close look at the main issues and investigate their adaptation so that other issues can be dealt with at a better time.