Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 (Bangladesh Liberation War)

Examining the Intellectual and Political Structure of Wars

Introduction: The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, commonly known as the Bangladesh Liberation War, was a significant conflict that led to the creation of an independent nation, Bangladesh. Lasting for nine months, this war witnessed a series of military operations, political struggles, and human rights abuses. The conflict emerged from the longstanding political and cultural differences between East and West Pakistan, resulting in a brutal campaign for independence. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, exploring its causes, key events, and outcomes.

Causes: The roots of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 can be traced back to the partition of India in 1947, which led to the creation of two separate nations: India and Pakistan. Pakistan consisted of two geographically distinct regions, East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh) and West Pakistan (present-day Pakistan). The cultural, linguistic, and economic disparities between the two wings led to a sense of neglect and discrimination among the people of East Pakistan. The ruling elite in West Pakistan, predominantly from the military and political spheres, imposed their authority on East Pakistan, further fueling discontent and demands for autonomy. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, emerged as the dominant political force in East Pakistan. In the general elections held in 1970, the Awami League secured a clear majority in the National Assembly, but the ruling establishment in West Pakistan refused to hand over power, triggering widespread protests and strikes.

On March 25, 1971, the Pakistan Army launched Operation Searchlight, a brutal military crackdown on the East Pakistani population. This operation aimed to suppress the growing demands for autonomy and independence. It resulted in widespread violence, including killings, rape, and forced displacement of millions of people. In response to the Pakistani Army’s atrocities, Bengali nationalists and freedom fighters formed the Mukti Bahini, a guerrilla force dedicated to the liberation of Bangladesh. They engaged in hit-and-run tactics and received support and training from India. India, facing the influx of millions of refugees from East Pakistan, decided to intervene militarily to support the cause of the Bengali people. On December 3, 1971, India launched a full-scale military operation against Pakistan. The war witnessed significant naval engagements, with the Indian Navy imposing a blockade on East Pakistan, effectively cutting off its supply lines. The Indian Navy also launched airstrikes on Pakistani ports, disabling their naval capabilities. The Indian Air Force conducted airstrikes on Pakistani airfields, destroying a significant number of aircraft and establishing air superiority. The use of air power played a crucial role in tipping the balance in favor of India.

Indian ground forces, in collaboration with the Mukti Bahini, launched a two-front offensive against Pakistan. The war witnessed several major battles, including the Battle of Garibpur, Battle of Hilli, and Battle of Basantar. The Indian Army made significant advances, capturing key territories and encircling Pakistani forces. On December 16, 1971, Lieutenant General A.A.K. Niazi, the commander of Pakistani forces in East Pakistan, surrendered to Lieutenant General Jagjit Singh Aurora of the Indian Army. This marked the end of the war and the birth of Bangladesh as an independent nation.

Birth of Bangladesh: The war resulted in the emergence of Bangladesh as an independent nation, ending the oppressive rule of West Pakistan and granting self-determination to the people of East Pakistan. The conflict caused a massive humanitarian crisis, with millions of refugees seeking shelter in India. The atrocities committed by the Pakistani Army led to international condemnation and calls for justice. The war strained relations between India and Pakistan, leaving a lasting impact on their bilateral ties. It created a deep sense of mistrust and hostility, leading to subsequent conflicts between the two nations. The war also had geopolitical implications. India’s military success showcased its regional dominance and significantly weakened Pakistan’s position in South Asia. The war highlighted the importance of human rights and self-determination. The international community recognized Bangladesh as an independent nation, and efforts were made to address the human rights abuses committed during the conflict. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, also known as the Bangladesh Liberation War, was a significant chapter in the history of the Indian subcontinent. The conflict resulted in the birth of Bangladesh and brought an end to the oppressive rule of West Pakistan over East Pakistan. It also exposed the brutalities of war, with widespread human rights abuses and a massive refugee crisis. The war hadfar-reaching implications, affecting India-Pakistan relations, regional geopolitics, and the global discourse on self-determination and human rights. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 remains a significant event that shaped the modern history of South Asia and serves as a reminder of the importance of addressing political, cultural, and economic disparities to prevent conflicts of such magnitude in the future.

The war attracted international attention and involvement. India received political and diplomatic support from countries like the Soviet Union, which signed a treaty of peace, friendship, and cooperation with India in August 1971. The United States, on the other hand, initially supported Pakistan due to its Cold War interests and geopolitical considerations. However, as the extent of human rights abuses became apparent, public opinion in the US shifted, and the government took a more cautious approach. The United Nations played a role in mediating the crisis through the appointment of a special envoy, but its efforts were hindered by the veto powers of the Security Council. The Mukti Bahini, composed of Bengali nationalists and freedom fighters, played a vital role in the war. They conducted guerrilla warfare, disrupted Pakistani supply lines, and carried out acts of sabotage. The Mukti Bahini received training, weapons, and support from India. Indian intelligence agencies, such as RAW (Research and Analysis Wing), played a crucial role in organizing and coordinating their activities. The war resulted in a severe humanitarian crisis, with an estimated 10 million refugees fleeing East Pakistan to seek safety in India. India faced the daunting task of providing shelter, food, and medical assistance to the refugees, putting a significant strain on its resources and economy. The Pakistani Army’s crackdown on the Bengali population involved widespread human rights abuses, including mass killings, torture, and sexual violence. The Pakistani Army specifically targeted intellectuals, students, and members of the Hindu minority. It has been estimated that between 300,000 and 3 million people were killed during the war, with women being subject to widespread rape and sexual violence. International media coverage played a crucial role in exposing the atrocities committed during the war. Journalists and photographers documented the violence and provided evidence of the scale of human rights abuses. The media coverage helped generate public support for the cause of Bangladesh’s independence and put pressure on governments to take action. In the aftermath of the war, efforts were made to bring the perpetrators of war crimes to justice. The International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh was established in 2010 to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the war. Reconciliation and healing processes have also been initiated, aiming to address the trauma and division caused by the conflict. The importance of acknowledging and coming to terms with the past has been emphasized to foster national unity and prevent future conflicts. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 had a lasting impact on the region, influencing politics, security dynamics, and the relationship between India and Pakistan. It remains a significant event in the history of South Asia, serving as a reminder of the consequences of political and cultural marginalization and the importance of upholding human rights and self-determination.

India’s decision to intervene in the conflict was motivated by several factors. The influx of millions of refugees from East Pakistan into India put a strain on resources and created a humanitarian crisis. Additionally, India saw an opportunity to support the aspirations of the Bengali people and weaken Pakistan’s dominance in the region. India provided training, arms, and sanctuary to the Mukti Bahini, allowing them to organize and conduct operations against the Pakistani Army. The Indian Army, supported by the Indian Air Force and Navy, launched a well-coordinated offensive, which eventually led to the liberation of Bangladesh. The Pakistani military, under the leadership of General Yahiya Khan, initially believed that the use of force would quell the Bengali independence movement swiftly. However, their brutal crackdown and the ensuing resistance from the Mukti Bahini and Indian forces proved them wrong. Pakistani forces primarily focused on brutal repression and maintaining control over urban areas, while underestimating the determination and resilience of the Bengali population. The war had a profound impact on the Bengali diaspora worldwide. Bengalis living outside Bangladesh actively supported the cause of independence, organizing protests, raising awareness, and providing financial assistance. The war also led to a significant migration of Bengalis to various parts of the world, particularly to countries like the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. After the war, the international community, including organizations like the United Nations and non-governmental organizations, provided humanitarian assistance to Bangladesh. Efforts were made to rebuild the war-torn nation, focusing on infrastructure development, economic recovery, and social welfare programs. The war resulted in a large number of prisoners of war (POWs) from both sides. India held approximately 90,000 Pakistani POWs, while Pakistan held a smaller number of Indian POWs. The repatriation of POWs began after the signing of the Simla Agreement in 1972, which outlined the terms for the release and repatriation of prisoners. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 continues to have a lasting impact on the collective memory of the people of Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan. It is celebrated in Bangladesh as Victory Day on December 16 each year. The war is also remembered through memorials, museums, and exhibitions, which serve as a reminder of the sacrifices made during the struggle for independence.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 remains a significant event in the history of South Asia, shaping the political, social, and cultural landscape of the region. It led to the birth of Bangladesh as an independent nation and highlighted the importance of self-determination, human rights, and the consequences of marginalization. The war’s impact on the involved nations and the international community serves as a reminder of the complexities and consequences of conflicts rooted in political, cultural, and economic disparities. The naval aspect of the war witnessed significant engagements between the Indian Navy and the Pakistani Navy. The Indian Navy implemented a naval blockade, cutting off crucial sea routes and preventing reinforcement and resupply for Pakistani forces in East Pakistan. One notable naval operation was Operation Trident, launched by the Indian Navy on the night of December 4, 1971. Indian missile boats attacked the Pakistani naval base in Karachi, causing significant damage to Pakistani vessels and infrastructure. The Indian Air Force (IAF) played a crucial role in providing aerial support to ground operations. It conducted air strikes against Pakistani airfields, infrastructure, and military targets in East Pakistan. The IAF’s offensive capabilities were demonstrated in Operation Chengiz Khan, an airstrike on the Pakistani airbase at Tezgaon in Dhaka. The attack resulted in the destruction of several Pakistani aircraft and the crippling of their air operations. The turning point of the war came on December 16, 1971, when Lieutenant General A.A.K. Niazi, the commander of Pakistani forces in East Pakistan, signed the Instrument of Surrender in Dhaka. This historic event marked the formal end of the war and the birth of Bangladesh as an independent nation. The surrender ceremony was attended by senior Indian military officials and marked a significant victory for the Indian Armed Forces and the Mukti Bahini. The war significantly strained the relationship between India and Pakistan. The deep-rooted animosity and unresolved issues between the two countries, such as the Kashmir dispute, continued to hinder diplomatic progress. The Simla Agreement, signed in 1972 between India and Pakistan, aimed to normalize relations, resolve conflicts through peaceful means, and promote bilateral cooperation.

The war had broader implications beyond the immediate region. It showcased India’s military capabilities and established it as a dominant regional power. The conflict also had an impact on the global balance of power during the Cold War era. The Soviet Union’s support for India during the war strained its relations with the United States, which had aligned with Pakistan. Several military leaders emerged as key figures during the war. Lieutenant General Jagjit Singh Aurora led the Indian forces as the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Eastern Command and played a pivotal role in the liberation of Bangladesh. On the Pakistani side, Lieutenant General A.A.K.

Niazi was the commander of Pakistani forces in East Pakistan. He became a controversial figure due to his role in the atrocities committed during the conflict. It reshaped the political and territorial landscape of South Asia, led to the birth of Bangladesh, and left a lasting impact on the military doctrines and strategies of India and Pakistan. The war’s legacy continues to shape regional dynamics and acts as a reminder of the complexities and challenges of conflict resolution in the region.

Role of International Relief Efforts: International relief efforts were crucial in providing humanitarian assistance during and after the war. Organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) worked to provide food, shelter, medical aid, and rehabilitation support to the affected population. The ICRC played a significant role in coordinating relief efforts, facilitating the repatriation of prisoners of war, and assisting in the identification and reuniting of separated families. The war had a profound impact on India’s security doctrine and military strategy. It highlighted the importance of maintaining a robust defense capability, especially in the face of asymmetric warfare and internal conflicts. The success of India’s military intervention in East Pakistan also influenced India’s approach to regional security and its perception of its role as a regional power. Women played a significant role in various capacities during the war. They served as combatants in the Mukti Bahini, providing crucial support in intelligence gathering, logistics, and nursing. Women in Bangladesh actively participated in the independence movement, took on leadership roles, and contributed to the rebuilding and development of the newly formed nation. The war had significant economic ramifications for both India and Pakistan. East Pakistan, which became Bangladesh, faced the challenge of rebuilding its economy and infrastructure after years of neglect and devastation. The conflict also strained Pakistan’s economy, as it lost a significant portion of its industrial and agricultural output. The country faced the task of rebuilding and recovering from the war’s aftermath. Diplomatic efforts were crucial in resolving the conflict and its aftermath. The Indian government engaged in diplomatic initiatives to garner international support for Bangladesh’s cause and put pressure on Pakistan to end the war. The Shimla Agreement, signed between India and Pakistan in 1972, aimed to normalize relations and establish peaceful coexistence. It emphasized the importance of bilateral negotiations and respect for each other’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. The war inspired various forms of artistic expression, including literature, music, and films. Many writers, poets, and artists produced works that reflected the spirit of the independence movement, the sufferings endured, and the triumph of Bangladesh’s liberation. Films like “Muktir Gaan” and “A River Called Titas” captured the war’s impact on the people and their struggles for freedom.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 had multidimensional effects, ranging from political and military to social and cultural. It shaped the course of history for Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan and left a lasting impact on the people and nations involved. The war’s memory continues to be preserved through various forms of commemoration and serves as a reminder of the importance of peace, self-determination, and the consequences of conflict. It represents a seminal moment in the quest for independence, the protection of human rights, and the establishment of new nations. The war’s impact resonates through political, social, and cultural aspects, shaping the identities and aspirations of the people involved. Following the war, Bangladesh’s independence was recognized by a significant number of countries worldwide. India played a key role in garnering support and advocating for Bangladesh’s recognition as a sovereign nation. The United Nations General Assembly admitted Bangladesh as a member in 1974, solidifying its international recognition. The war resulted in one of the largest refugee crises in history. Millions of Bengalis from East Pakistan fled to India to escape the violence and persecution. The Indian government, along with international organizations, established refugee camps and provided aid to the displaced population. The repatriation of refugees after the war was a significant challenge. Efforts were made to ensure their safe return to Bangladesh and to assist in their resettlement and rehabilitation. The war was marked by widespread human rights abuses and atrocities committed by the Pakistani military. These included mass killings, torture, rape, and ethnic cleansing. In recent years, there have been efforts to hold individuals accountable for war crimes committed during the conflict. The International Crimes Tribunal in Bangladesh has conducted trials and handed down verdicts against those accused of war crimes and genocide.

The war had a transformative impact on East Pakistan, which later became the independent nation of Bangladesh. It led to a resurgence of Bengali nationalism, cultural revival, and the establishment of a new political and administrative framework. Bangladesh adopted a secular and democratic constitution, with Bangla (Bengali) as its official language. The media played a crucial role in covering the war and bringing international attention to the atrocities taking place in East Pakistan. Journalists and photographers risked their lives to document the conflict and shed light on the plight of the Bengali people. The media coverage played a significant role in raising awareness, mobilizing support, and influencing public opinion around the world. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 continues to shape the geopolitical dynamics of South Asia. It remains a significant event in the history of the region, symbolizing the struggle for self-determination, human rights, and national identity. The war’s legacy is reflected in the ongoing challenges and complexities in the relationship between Bangladesh and Pakistan. The two nations continue to grapple with unresolved issues, including border disputes and the repatriation of stranded Pakistanis in Bangladesh. The Mukti Bahini, a guerrilla force composed of Bengali freedom fighters, played a crucial role in the war. They conducted ambushes, sabotage missions, and hit-and-run attacks on Pakistani forces, disrupting their operations and providing support to the Indian military. The Mukti Bahini’s guerrilla tactics and resilience were instrumental in weakening the Pakistani military’s hold on East Pakistan and bolstering the morale of the Bengali population.

The war resulted in a severe humanitarian crisis, with widespread suffering and loss of life. The conflict led to a massive death toll, estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands, due to direct violence, displacement, and famine. The international community responded with humanitarian aid to address the urgent needs of the affected population. Relief efforts focused on providing food, medical assistance, and shelter to those displaced by the war. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 attracted the attention and involvement of external powers. The United States, China, and several Muslim-majority countries supported Pakistan, while India received support from the Soviet Union and some Eastern Bloc nations. The war highlighted the geopolitical complexities of the Cold War era, with the conflict serving as a proxy battleground between the United States and the Soviet Union. The defeat in the war had profound consequences for the Pakistani military. It led to a significant reevaluation of its strategies, doctrines, and training methods. The Pakistani military underwent structural and operational reforms in the aftermath of the war to address the shortcomings exposed during the conflict. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 is commemorated annually in Bangladesh as Victory Day, observed on December 16th. The day is marked with parades, cultural events, and ceremonies to honor the sacrifices made during the war. The war’s veterans and freedom fighters are celebrated for their contributions to the independence of Bangladesh, and their stories continue to be passed down through generations.

The war had broader implications for regional stability in South Asia. It led to a realignment of power dynamics, with India emerging as a dominant force in the region and Pakistan facing challenges in rebuilding and redefining its national identity. The conflict also influenced neighboring countries, such as Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, and Nepal, who drew lessons from the war’s outcomes and its impact on the balance of power in the region. It represents the struggle for self-determination, the consequences of ethnic and political tensions, and the resilience of people in the face of adversity. The war’s effects continue to shape national narratives, foreign policies, and regional dynamics, emphasizing the importance of peace, diplomacy, and the pursuit of justice. The war drew significant attention from the international community, leading to diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict. Several countries, including the United States and the Soviet Union, attempted to mediate between India and Pakistan to find a peaceful solution. The United Nations also played a role in trying to facilitate negotiations. The Security Council passed resolutions calling for a ceasefire and a peaceful settlement of the conflict. However, these efforts did not result in a resolution before the war concluded. The war witnessed significant naval operations in the Bay of Bengal. The Indian Navy played a crucial role in enforcing a naval blockade on East Pakistan, cutting off supply lines and preventing reinforcement of Pakistani troops. The Indian Navy also conducted several successful operations, including the bombing of the Pakistani port of Chittagong and the destruction of the Pakistani submarine PNS Ghazi.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 provided a major boost to the Bangladesh Liberation War. The Indian military intervention, combined with the activities of the Mukti Bahini, created a favorable environment for the Bengali freedom fighters. The coordination between the Indian armed forces and the Mukti Bahini, along with the air and ground support provided by India, significantly weakened the Pakistani military’s control over East Pakistan. The Indian Air Force (IAF) played a crucial role in the war, particularly in achieving air superiority over East Pakistan. The IAF conducted numerous airstrikes, targeting Pakistani airfields, military infrastructure, and communication networks. The IAF’s precision strikes and effective air cover provided a significant advantage to the Indian Army and contributed to the success of the military campaign. While the majority of the war’s focus was on East Pakistan, clashes also occurred in the western theater. The Indian Army launched limited offensives against Pakistani positions in the west, aiming to divert Pakistani forces and relieve pressure on the eastern front. The western theater saw battles in the regions of Rajasthan, Punjab, and Kashmir. The war ended with the signing of the Instrument of Surrender by the Pakistani forces in Dhaka, marking the formal end of the conflict. After the war, efforts were made to reconcile and rebuild relations between India and Pakistan. The Simla Agreement, signed in July 1972, outlined the principles for resolving bilateral disputes and maintaining peaceful relations. The wounds of the war and the issues surrounding it have persisted, leading to ongoing tensions between the two nations, particularly regarding the status of Jammu and Kashmir and the treatment of minority populations. The war’s legacy continues to influence the dynamics between the nations involved and serves as a reminder of the complexities and consequences of armed conflicts.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, also known as the Bangladesh Liberation War, involved the intervention of international actors that further complicated the conflict. The war took place during the height of the Cold War, with the United States and the Soviet Union vying for influence in the region. This geopolitical backdrop added complexity to the conflict. The United States, seeking to maintain its alliance with Pakistan as a Cold War ally, supported the Pakistani government both politically and militarily. The U.S. government provided military aid and turned a blind eye to the human rights abuses committed by the Pakistani military. On the other hand, the Soviet Union supported India, primarily due to its ideological rivalry with the United States and its desire to expand its influence in the region. The United States considered Pakistan a crucial ally in countering Soviet influence in the region, particularly during the Cold War. As a result, the U.S. government supported Pakistan’s position and downplayed the human rights violations committed during the war. The Nixon administration, led by President Richard Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, pursued a policy of supporting Pakistan and maintaining its unity, even as evidence of atrocities in East Pakistan emerged. This support included providing military equipment, logistical support, and diplomatic cover for Pakistan, which complicated the situation by prolonging the conflict and undermining international efforts to resolve it peacefully.

China, having a territorial dispute with India and seeking to counter Indian influence, supported Pakistan during the war. It provided diplomatic, military, and logistical support to Pakistan. China’s involvement further escalated the conflict and complicated diplomatic efforts to find a peaceful resolution. It also strained China’s relationship with India, leading to increased tensions between the two countries. The Soviet Union, as part of its broader Cold War strategy, supported India during the war. It provided military assistance, including arms, equipment, and training, to the Indian armed forces. The Soviet Union’s support for India tilted the balance of power in favor of the Indian side and contributed to the eventual defeat of Pakistan. It further complicated the conflict by deepening the divide between the superpowers and their respective allies.

The United Nations played a role in trying to mediate between India and Pakistan and resolve the conflict diplomatically. However, the Security Council’s efforts were hindered by Cold War politics and the veto power of the superpowers. The United States and China, as permanent members of the Security Council, used their veto power to prevent resolutions that would have condemned Pakistan’s actions and supported Bangladesh’s independence. The inability of the United Nations to effectively address the conflict due to the geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War further complicated the issue and prolonged the suffering of the Bengali population. The interventions and support of international actors during the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 added complexity to the conflict. Cold War dynamics, with the United States and the Soviet Union backing opposing sides, exacerbated tensions and hindered efforts to find a peaceful solution. China’s involvement, driven by its own geopolitical interests, further complicated the situation. The international dimension of the conflict prolonged the suffering of the Bengali population and affected the balance of power on the ground.

The alignment of the United States and China during the war further complicated the conflict. The United States, under President Nixon’s administration, pursued a policy of rapprochement with China as part of its larger strategy to counterbalance the Soviet Union. The United States sought to gain China’s support in its efforts to isolate the Soviet Union and perceived India, a close ally of the Soviet Union, as a potential threat. This alignment influenced the U.S. stance on the Indo-Pakistani conflict, leading to a pro-Pakistan tilt and limited condemnation of Pakistan’s actions in East Pakistan. The severe humanitarian crisis resulting from the war attracted international attention and concern. Reports of widespread atrocities, mass killings, and the displacement of millions of people prompted calls for international intervention. The geopolitical considerations of the Cold War era complicated the international response. The United States, in particular, downplayed the magnitude of the humanitarian crisis and supported Pakistan to preserve its alliance and counter Soviet influence. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a group of countries that sought to maintain neutrality during the Cold War, played a role in the conflict. Some NAM member states, such as India, used their platform to garner support for Bangladesh’s independence and condemn Pakistan’s actions. The NAM’s support for Bangladesh’s cause added a dimension of international legitimacy to the Bengali struggle and increased pressure on Pakistan. However, the NAM’s influence was limited compared to the major powers involved in the conflict.

The massive influx of refugees from East Pakistan into neighboring India further internationalized the conflict. The refugee crisis strained India’s resources and drew attention from the international community. Several countries and international organizations provided humanitarian aid to support the refugees and address their urgent needs. This assistance, while crucial for the affected population, also added to the complexity of the conflict and highlighted the international ramifications of the war. Various countries and international organizations made diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict and bring an end to the war. These initiatives aimed to mitigate the suffering and loss of life and prevent the escalation of tensions in the region. The diverging interests of the major powers involved, particularly the United States and the Soviet Union, hindered the effectiveness of these diplomatic efforts. The superpowers’ alignment with their respective allies complicated the search for a peaceful resolution. The involvement of international actors in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 added layers of complexity and influenced the dynamics of the conflict. Geopolitical considerations, Cold War rivalries, and the alignment of major powers impacted the international response, humanitarian assistance, and diplomatic initiatives. These factors further complicated the conflict and prolonged the suffering of the Bengali population. The Soviet Union provided substantial support to India during the war. It recognized the legitimacy of the Bengali independence movement and condemned the actions of the Pakistani military in East Pakistan. The Soviet Union supplied India with military equipment, including tanks, aircraft, and naval vessels. Soviet military advisers also played a role in training and assisting the Indian armed forces. The Soviet support strengthened India’s position and significantly tilted the balance of power in favor of the Indian side. This assistance had a crucial impact on the outcome of the war.

The United States maintained a close relationship with Pakistan during the conflict due to its Cold War interests and regional considerations. The U.S. government viewed Pakistan as a vital ally in containing Soviet influence in South Asia. The United States provided military and economic aid to Pakistan, including arms and ammunition, which indirectly supported the Pakistani military’s actions in East Pakistan. The U.S. administration, led by President Nixon and National Security Advisor Kissinger, sought to maintain Pakistan’s unity and downplayed reports of human rights abuses committed by the Pakistani military. China played a significant role in supporting Pakistan during the war. It viewed Pakistan as a strategic ally and sought to counter India’s influence in the region. China provided diplomatic, military, and logistical support to Pakistan. It supplied arms and ammunition, and Chinese military advisers were present in Pakistan to assist in the war effort. China’s involvement in the conflict further complicated the situation by adding another dimension to the geopolitical dynamics and prolonging the war.

The United Nations played a significant role in attempting to resolve the conflict diplomatically and alleviate the humanitarian crisis. The Security Council passed resolutions calling for a ceasefire and a peaceful settlement of the conflict. However, the Cold War rivalry and the veto power of the superpowers hindered the effectiveness of the United Nations in resolving the conflict. The United States and China used their veto power to prevent stronger actions against Pakistan. The inability of the United Nations to take decisive action to stop the war and address the humanitarian crisis further complicated the conflict and prolonged the suffering of the Bengali population. The war resulted in a massive humanitarian crisis, with millions of refugees fleeing from East Pakistan to neighboring India. The refugee crisis drew international attention and prompted calls for humanitarian assistance. Several countries and international organizations provided aid and support to the refugees in India. They offered medical assistance, food, shelter, and other forms of humanitarian aid to alleviate their suffering. The international response to the refugee crisis added another dimension to the conflict, highlighting the need for a resolution and the urgency of addressing the human cost of the war. The support provided by the Soviet Union to India and the support of the United States and China to Pakistan complicated the situation and prolonged the war. Diplomatic efforts, including those by the United Nations, faced challenges due to the Cold War rivalry and the veto power of the superpowers. The war’s humanitarian aspects, including the refugee crisis, brought international attention and prompted assistance from various countries and organizations. The role of the United Nations (UN) and UN-affiliated non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in controlling and ending the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 (Bangladesh Liberation War) was significant, although their effectiveness was limited due to the geopolitical dynamics of the conflict.

The United Nations played a crucial role in attempting to control and end the conflict through diplomatic means. The Security Council passed several resolutions during the war, calling for an immediate ceasefire and a peaceful resolution of the conflict. The UN Secretary-General, U Thant, made efforts to mediate between India and Pakistan and initiated diplomatic initiatives to find a peaceful solution. He visited both countries and held discussions with their leaders. The Cold War dynamics and the veto power of the superpowers, particularly the United States and China, limited the UN’s ability to take stronger actions and enforce its resolutions effectively. UN-affiliated NGOs and humanitarian organizations played a crucial role in providing humanitarian assistance and relief to the affected population. They worked to address the immense suffering and displacement caused by the war. Organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) were involved in providing medical aid, food, shelter, and other essential services to the affected people, particularly the millions of refugees who fled from East Pakistan to India. These organizations worked to alleviate the humanitarian crisis and provide support to the displaced and affected populations. Their efforts were instrumental in providing immediate relief to the victims of the conflict.

The United Nations deployed peacekeeping and observer missions during the conflict to monitor the situation on the ground and promote a peaceful resolution. The UN Security Council established the United Nations India-Pakistan Observation Mission (UNIPOM) in 1971 with the objective of supervising the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The UNIPOM was hindered by challenges such as limited mandate, lack of full cooperation from both parties, and the outbreak of hostilities between India and Pakistan. As a result, the mission was not able to effectively control or end the conflict. The United Nations, through its various bodies and resolutions, exerted international pressure on both India and Pakistan to seek a peaceful resolution and end the conflict. UN member states, particularly those aligned with the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), used their platforms to condemn Pakistan’s actions in East Pakistan and support the cause of Bangladesh’s independence. This international pressure added moral and political weight to the calls for a resolution. The geopolitical interests of major powers, particularly the United States and China, complicated the effectiveness of international pressure and limited the extent of sanctions or punitive measures against Pakistan. Despite these efforts, the role of the United Nations and UN-affiliated NGOs in controlling and ending the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 was relatively limited. The geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War era, the veto power of the superpowers, and the conflicting interests of major players in the conflict hindered their effectiveness. While humanitarian assistance and relief efforts were significant, the UN’s diplomatic initiatives and peacekeeping missions faced challenges and were not able to comprehensively control or end the conflict. The resolution of the conflict ultimately came through military means, with India’s military intervention leading to the surrender of Pakistan and the emergence of Bangladesh as an independent nation.

The United Nations made diplomatic efforts to control and end the conflict. The UN Secretary-General, U Thant, engaged in shuttle diplomacy, visiting India and Pakistan to facilitate dialogue and negotiate a peaceful resolution. UN Thant proposed a three-phase plan, which included a ceasefire, withdrawal of forces, and negotiations for a political settlement. However, the plan was rejected by Pakistan, which continued its military operations in East Pakistan. The UN General Assembly passed a resolution in December 1971, urging an immediate cessation of hostilities and a peaceful resolution of the conflict, but it lacked enforcement mechanisms. UN-affiliated NGOs and humanitarian organizations played a crucial role in providing relief to the affected population. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) were active in providing aid and support to the millions of refugees who fled from East Pakistan to India. These organizations worked to address the immediate needs of the displaced population, including food, shelter, healthcare, and sanitation. They also facilitated the repatriation of refugees after the conflict. The United Nations deployed observer missions to monitor the situation on the ground. The United Nations India-Pakistan Observation Mission (UNIPOM) was established to supervise the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. UNIPOM faced challenges in carrying out its mandate. Both India and Pakistan were reluctant to fully cooperate, and tensions escalated between the two countries. The mission was eventually terminated in March 1972 due to the outbreak of hostilities between India and Pakistan.

The international community, through the United Nations and other platforms, exerted pressure on India and Pakistan to seek a peaceful resolution. Many countries, particularly those aligned with the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), condemned Pakistan’s actions in East Pakistan and supported the cause of Bangladesh’s independence. Due to the Cold War dynamics and the alignment of major powers, comprehensive sanctions or punitive measures against Pakistan were limited. The geopolitical interests of the United States and China, who supported Pakistan, influenced the international response to the conflict. The conflict was resolved through military means rather than diplomatic efforts. India intervened militarily in December 1971, supporting the Bangladesh insurgency and launching a full-scale offensive against Pakistan. The Indian armed forces achieved significant gains, leading to the surrender of Pakistan’s military forces in Dhaka on December 16, 1971. This resulted in the emergence of Bangladesh as an independent nation. The military intervention by India played a decisive role in ending the conflict and establishing Bangladesh as a sovereign state.

While the United Nations and UN-affiliated NGOs played important roles in providing humanitarian assistance, advocating for a resolution, and monitoring the situation, their ability to control and end the conflict comprehensively was limited. The resolution ultimately came through military means, with India’s intervention leading to the defeat of Pakistan and the formation of Bangladesh. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 resulted in the liberation of East Pakistan, which subsequently emerged as the independent nation of Bangladesh. The war began on March 25, 1971, when the Pakistani military launched a crackdown on the Bengali population in East Pakistan, in response to their demands for autonomy and political rights. The Bengali resistance, known as the Mukti Bahini, fought against the Pakistani forces with the support of India. The conflict escalated into a full-scale war between India and Pakistan. India’s military intervention played a crucial role in turning the tide of the war, leading to the surrender of Pakistan’s military forces in Dhaka on December 16, 1971.

The war led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with widespread violence, mass killings, and displacement of the civilian population. The Pakistani military’s actions in East Pakistan resulted in large-scale atrocities, including killings, torture, sexual violence, and the targeting of intellectuals. It is estimated that between 300,000 to 3 million people were killed during the conflict, and millions more were displaced as refugees, seeking safety in neighboring India. The international community condemned these human rights abuses, with the term “genocide” being used to describe the scale and nature of the violence. Following the liberation of Bangladesh, it gained recognition as an independent nation from countries around the world. India was one of the first countries to recognize Bangladesh on December 6, 1971. Other countries, including the Soviet Union, United States, United Kingdom, and many non-aligned nations, also extended recognition to Bangladesh. Bangladesh became a member of the United Nations in 1974 and has since established diplomatic relations with numerous countries worldwide. The war had a profound impact on India-Pakistan relations, exacerbating existing tensions between the two nations. Pakistan perceived India’s intervention as an act of aggression and harbored resentment towards India for supporting the Bengali insurgency. The war further deepened the divide between India and Pakistan, leading to strained relations and subsequent conflicts between the two countries in the years that followed.

In the aftermath of the war, efforts were made to hold individuals accountable for war crimes and human rights abuses committed during the conflict. The Bangladesh government established the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) in 2010 to investigate and prosecute those responsible for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity during the 1971 war. The ICT has conducted trials and handed down judgments against several individuals, including political leaders, military personnel, and members of Islamist militias, who were found guilty of committing atrocities during the war. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 had far-reaching consequences, leading to the liberation of Bangladesh, a significant humanitarian crisis, and a lasting impact on India-Pakistan relations. The war crimes trials in Bangladesh have sought to establish justice for the victims and hold accountable those responsible for the atrocities committed during the conflict. During the war, international support for Bangladesh’s liberation grew. Countries like India, the former Soviet Union, and a significant number of non-aligned nations provided diplomatic, political, and material support to the Bengali resistance. India played a crucial role in supporting the Mukti Bahini and providing shelter to millions of refugees fleeing East Pakistan. It also provided military training, weapons, and logistical support to the Bengali fighters. The Soviet Union supported Bangladesh’s cause and condemned Pakistan’s actions, while the United States initially showed sympathy towards Pakistan but later shifted its stance as the scale of the atrocities became evident.

The war reshaped the geopolitical dynamics in South Asia. With the creation of Bangladesh, the region saw the emergence of a new nation and a shift in the balance of power. India’s military intervention and support for Bangladesh solidified its position as the dominant power in the region, while Pakistan faced humiliation and a loss of territory. The war also strained India’s relations with other countries in the region, particularly with Pakistan, which led to subsequent conflicts and a lasting rivalry between the two nations. The war resulted in a massive influx of refugees into India. Millions of Bengalis fled East Pakistan due to the violence and sought refuge across the border. The humanitarian crisis posed significant challenges for India, which had to provide shelter, food, and other basic necessities to the refugees. It strained India’s resources and infrastructure. After the war, efforts were made to repatriate the refugees to newly formed Bangladesh. The United Nations and other organizations assisted in facilitating the repatriation process, though it was a complex and time-consuming task. The war had a profound and lasting impact on Bangladesh as a nation. It marked the birth of the country and its struggle for independence. Bangladesh faced significant challenges after independence, including post-war reconstruction, rebuilding institutions, and addressing the social and economic needs of its population. The war also had a cultural impact, with the emergence of a distinct Bengali identity and a renewed sense of nationalism among the people of Bangladesh.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 highlighted the limitations of international diplomacy and the challenges of resolving conflicts through peaceful means. The war also underscored the importance of addressing grievances and ensuring political rights for minority populations within a country. The conflict resolution process emphasized the need for accountability for war crimes and human rights abuses, as exemplified by the war crimes trials in Bangladesh. Its impact on Bangladesh, India-Pakistan relations, and the international community’s approach to conflict resolution continues to resonate today. The Bengali resistance, known as the Mukti Bahini, employed guerrilla warfare tactics against the Pakistani military forces. They engaged in hit-and-run attacks, ambushes, and sabotage operations. The Mukti Bahini’s ability to disrupt Pakistani military operations and maintain a sustained resistance played a crucial role in the war. The guerrilla fighters received training and support from India, and their efforts contributed to the overall success of the liberation movement. India imposed a naval blockade on East Pakistan, cutting off crucial supply routes and isolating the region from the rest of Pakistan. The Indian Air Force conducted airstrikes against Pakistani military targets, including airfields, radar installations, and military infrastructure. These operations significantly weakened Pakistan’s ability to sustain its military campaign and provided an advantage to the Bengali resistance and the Indian armed forces.

The war received extensive international media coverage, which helped to expose the scale of the atrocities committed by the Pakistani military in East Pakistan. Journalists, photographers, and reporters documented the war, bringing global attention to the plight of the Bengali population and the need for international intervention. The media coverage played a role in shaping public opinion and generating support for Bangladesh’s cause, putting pressure on governments to take action. The war had a profound impact on the identity and cultural fabric of Bangladesh. The struggle for independence and the atrocities committed by the Pakistani military reinforced a sense of Bengali nationalism and pride among the population. The Bengali language, which had been a significant point of contention between East and West Pakistan, gained official recognition and became the national language of Bangladesh. After the war, efforts were made to reconcile and rebuild relations between India and Pakistan. In 1972, India and Pakistan signed the Simla Agreement, which outlined the principles for the normalization of bilateral relations, including the return of prisoners of war and the establishment of a peaceful Line of Control in the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir. Despite these efforts, the deep-rooted mistrust and unresolved issues between India and Pakistan have continued to impact their relationship, resulting in subsequent conflicts and tensions.

Guerrilla warfare, naval blockade, international media coverage, and the impact on identity and language. Its effects continue to shape the region’s history, politics, and relationships. Extreme religious ideology played a role in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. The conflict had underlying religious tensions that contributed to the political and social dynamics leading up to the war. The roots of the religious tensions can be traced back to the partition of British India in 1947, which led to the creation of two separate nations: India with a Hindu majority and Pakistan with a Muslim majority. The Two-Nation Theory, propagated by Muslim League leaders, argued that Hindus and Muslims were separate nations and could not coexist within a single country. The idea of religious identity as the basis for nationhood fueled the demand for a separate Muslim-majority state, resulting in the creation of Pakistan. Division of British India into predominantly Hindu India and Muslim-majority Pakistan left a significant Muslim population in India and a sizable Hindu and other minority population in Pakistan.

Bengali Language and Cultural Identity: In East Pakistan, which later became Bangladesh, a significant cultural and linguistic divide emerged between the Bengali-speaking population and the predominantly Urdu-speaking West Pakistan. The imposition of Urdu as the sole national language and the suppression of the Bengali language and culture by the Pakistani government further exacerbated tensions. The Bengali population, which had a distinct cultural and linguistic identity, felt marginalized and discriminated against, leading to demands for greater autonomy and recognition of their language and culture. The political landscape in East Pakistan was marked by a struggle for power between the dominant West Pakistani elites, who were primarily from the military and political establishment, and the Bengali political leaders. The Pakistani military’s actions in East Pakistan during the war were characterized by a brutal crackdown on the Bengali population, which had predominantly Muslim, Hindu, and other religious communities. The military targeted political leaders, intellectuals, and individuals perceived as supporting the Bengali nationalist movement, irrespective of their religious affiliation. While the conflict was primarily rooted in political and ethnic grievances, the religious identity of the Bengali population and the religious ideology of some Pakistani military and political leaders influenced the way the conflict unfolded.

During the war, Islamist militias, such as the Razakars and Al-Badr, aligned with the Pakistani military and actively participated in the violence and atrocities committed against the Bengali population. These militias were driven by an extreme religious ideology and sought to suppress the Bengali nationalist movement, viewing it as a threat to the unity of Pakistan. The militias targeted individuals based on their religious identity, particularly those perceived as supporting the independence movement and those belonging to religious minority groups. It is important to note that while religious tensions and ideologies played a role in the conflict, the war was primarily a result of political, ethnic, and linguistic grievances, with diverse religious communities being affected by the violence and human rights abuses committed during the conflict. The idea of Islam as the defining factor of Pakistani nationalism was a significant element in the conflict. The Pakistani state envisioned itself as an Islamic republic, and Islam was considered an integral part of the national identity. This religious ideology influenced the policies and actions of the Pakistani government, particularly in its treatment of religious and ethnic minorities within its borders. In the context of the conflict, the Pakistani military and some political leaders viewed the Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan as a threat to the unity of Pakistan and as a challenge to the Islamic character of the state. The Pakistani government, under President Yahiya Khan, implemented policies aimed at Islamizing the country during the early 1970s. These policies included enforcing Islamic laws and practices, promoting Urdu as the national language, and imposing Islamic symbols and practices on the population. In East Pakistan, the imposition of Urdu and the suppression of the Bengali language and culture were seen as attempts to undermine the distinct Bengali identity and promote a homogenized Islamic identity.

Islamist militias, such as the Razakars and Al-Badr, aligned with the Pakistani military and played a significant role in the conflict. These militias embraced an extreme religious ideology and considered the Bengali nationalist movement as a threat to the unity of Pakistan and the Islamic character of the nation. They actively participated in the violence and atrocities committed against the Bengali population, targeting individuals based on their religious identity, including Muslims, Hindus, and other minorities. The war had severe consequences for religious minority communities in East Pakistan. Minorities, including Hindus, Christians, and Buddhists, faced persecution and targeted violence by the Pakistani military and Islamist militias, often based on their religious identity. Many minority community members were subjected to killings, rape, forced conversions, and displacement during the conflict. The extreme religious ideology of some actors involved in the war contributed to the specific targeting of religious minorities. It is important to note that the conflict also had secular and nationalist elements. The Bengali nationalist movement in East Pakistan sought autonomy and recognition of the Bengali language and culture, regardless of religious affiliation. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, advocated for a secular and inclusive Bangladesh. The conflict involved various political, ethnic, and linguistic grievances, and while religious ideology played a role, it was not the sole or defining factor. Where extreme religious ideology influenced the actions of some Pakistani military and political leaders and Islamist militias. However, it is essential to recognize that the conflict had multiple dimensions, including political, ethnic, and linguistic factors, and affected diverse religious communities, including Muslims, Hindus, and other minorities.

The war had significant international implications. India provided support to the Bengali nationalist movement, including training, arms, and shelter to refugees who fled from East Pakistan. Pakistan’s close ally, China, supported Pakistan during the conflict, providing diplomatic and military assistance. The United States initially supported Pakistan but later shifted its stance, condemning the human rights abuses and urging a peaceful resolution. India’s involvement and the international response added a geopolitical dimension to the conflict. The war led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with widespread violence, killings, and atrocities committed by the Pakistani military and Islamist militias. The conflict resulted in a massive influx of refugees into India, with millions of people fleeing from East Pakistan to seek safety and shelter.

The refugee crisis strained resources and infrastructure in the border regions of India, leading to a humanitarian challenge for the Indian government. Women played a crucial role in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. Many women were subjected to violence, including rape and sexual abuse, during the conflict. Women also participated in the resistance movement, providing support to the Mukti Bahini and actively engaging in various roles, such as nursing, communication, and intelligence gathering. The war had a significant impact on women’s rights and contributed to the subsequent women’s empowerment movement in Bangladesh. The war came to an end with the surrender of the Pakistani military on December 16, 1971, marking the formation of an independent Bangladesh. The conflict resulted in a significant loss of life, with estimates ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of people killed during the war and its aftermath. The creation of Bangladesh as a separate nation brought a sense of liberation and self-determination for the Bengali population. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 had far-reaching implications for the political landscape of South Asia. The war weakened Pakistan both politically and militarily, leading to a loss of territory and a blow to its international standing. It also had a lasting impact on the relationship between India and Pakistan, contributing to ongoing tensions and conflicts, particularly in relation to the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir. It left a lasting impact on the region, shaping geopolitics, national identities, and the lives of millions of people.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 was a significant conflict that had profound implications for the region and the world. The international factors that came into play during the war included support from various countries. India provided assistance to the Bengali nationalist movement, while Pakistan received diplomatic and military aid from its ally, China. The United States initially supported Pakistan but later shifted its stance, condemning human rights abuses and urging a peaceful resolution. The war also led to a severe humanitarian crisis, with widespread violence, killings, and atrocities committed by the Pakistani military and Islamist militias. This resulted in a massive influx of refugees into India, putting a significant strain on the country’s resources and infrastructure. Women played a crucial role in the conflict, with many subjected to violence, including rape and sexual abuse. However, they also participated in the resistance movement, providing support to the Mukti Bahini and actively engaging in various roles, such as nursing, communication, and intelligence gathering. The war had a significant impact on women’s rights and contributed to the subsequent women’s empowerment movement in Bangladesh. The war ended with the surrender of the Pakistani military on December 16, 1971, leading to the formation of an independent Bangladesh. The conflict resulted in a significant loss of life, with estimates ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of people killed during the war and its aftermath.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 had far-reaching implications for the political landscape of South Asia. The war weakened Pakistan both politically and militarily, leading to a loss of territory and a blow to its international standing. It also had a lasting impact on the relationship between India and Pakistan, contributing to ongoing tensions and conflicts, particularly in relation to the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir. The involvement of major global powers like India, China, and the United States added a complex geopolitical dimension to the conflict. This highlighted the strategic importance of the region and the competing interests at play. India’s support for the Bengali nationalist movement was seen as an act of intervention by Pakistan and its allies, escalating regional tensions. China’s backing of Pakistan was largely driven by its rivalry with India and desire to counter Indian influence in the subcontinent. The shifting stance of the United States, from supporting Pakistan initially to eventually condemning the human rights abuses, demonstrated the changing dynamics of international diplomacy and the pressures faced by the global powers. The scale of the atrocities committed by the Pakistani military and Islamist militias was staggering, with reports of mass killings, systematic rape, and other grave human rights violations. This caused immense suffering and trauma for the civilian population in East Pakistan.

The influx of millions of refugees into India overwhelmed the local infrastructure and resources, leading to a severe humanitarian crisis. The Indian government had to mobilize substantial aid and relief efforts to manage the inflow of displaced people. The refugee crisis also had wider regional implications, straining India’s own resources and potentially destabilizing the border areas. This added to the geopolitical complexity of the conflict. Women bore the brunt of the violence and were subjected to horrific acts of sexual violence by the Pakistani military and Islamist militias. Their suffering highlighted the gendered nature of the conflict and the vulnerability of women in times of war. Despite the atrocities, many women played active roles in the resistance movement, contributing to the Mukti Bahini’s efforts through various means. This demonstrated the courage and resilience of Bangladeshi women in the face of adversity. The war’s impact on women’s rights and the subsequent women’s empowerment movement in Bangladesh underscored the transformative potential of such conflicts in reshaping societal dynamics and gender relations. The surrender of the Pakistani military on December 16, 1971, marked a decisive end to the conflict and the emergence of an independent Bangladesh. This was a significant moment of triumph and liberation for the Bengali people. The staggering loss of life, ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions, highlighted the immense human cost of the war and the profound suffering inflicted on the population.

The creation of Bangladesh as a sovereign state had far-reaching implications for the regional balance of power, with Pakistan’s influence and international standing severely diminished. The war weakened Pakistan both politically and militarily, reducing its ability to project power and influence in the region. This shift in the regional dynamics altered the geopolitical landscape of South Asia. The ongoing tensions and conflicts between India and Pakistan, particularly over the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir, can be traced back to the unresolved issues and lingering resentments stemming from the 1971 war. The war’s impact on national identities, regional alliances, and the aspirations of the Bengali people continue to shape the political landscape of South Asia to this day. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 was a pivotal moment in the history of the subcontinent, with far-reaching consequences that reverberate through the region’s politics, social dynamics, and the lives of its people even today.